Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Filip Veger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Veger analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Filip Veger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Veger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 46.27% of points on their second serve, while Veger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Veger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 58.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Veger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46.43% of matches played (W/L 26/ 30), with Veger winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12). Veger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 9/ 15), where as Veger has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Veger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Veger winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Veger was at the Czech Republic F11, 01-12-2016, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Veger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Veger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Veger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.84 while Veger has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Veger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Veger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
99
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
478
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (332-199)
Career Total W/L
51% (150-142)
40% (12-18)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,900,825
Career Prize Money
$6,370
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Filip Veger For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zandschulp VS Veger
Zandschulp VS Veger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Filip Veger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
1st Serve % | 47% (24/51) | 67% (41/61) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (17/24) | 56% (23/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 35% (7/20) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 67% (2/3) |
Return Points W% | 51% (31/61) | 37% (19/51) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Veger H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Filip Veger
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Filip Veger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 41% (28/41) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (314/360) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
Aces Total | 130 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
DFs Total | 98 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:50 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 181.13 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1326/2130) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (906/1326) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (372/804) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (74/191) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (817/2138) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 6% (18/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Filip Veger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Viktor Filipenko
Player
Filip Veger
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jan Hernych
Player
Filip Veger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Filip Veger
Player
Arturs Lazdins
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Filip Veger
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Filip Veger
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Filip Veger
Player
Lloyd Harris
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Filip Veger
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Filip Veger
Player
Kristian Lozan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dino Marcan
Player
Filip Veger
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Denys Molchanov
Player
Filip Veger
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Zandschulp Vs Veger Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zandschulp are available here and Veger photos here.